Apple MacBook Retina 12-inch, Early 2016 (MLHA2, MLHC2, MMGM2, MMGL2, MLHE2, MLHF2, MLH82, MLH72)

alaTest on kerännyt ja analysoinut 153 arvostelut tuotteelle Apple MacBook Retina 12-inch, Early 2016 (MLHA2, MLHC2, MMGM2, MMGL2, MLHE2, MLHF2, MLH82, MLH72). Keskimääräinen antama arvosana tälle tuotteelle on 4.1/5, verrattuna keskimääräiseen arvosanaan 4.1/5 kategoriassa Kannettavat.

kannettavuus, suorituskyky, Tyylikkyys, näyttö, Käyttömukavuus

Vastinetta rahalle, liitettävyys

Me analysoimme käyttäjien ja ammattilaisten antamia arvosteluita, tuotteen ikää ja muita seikkoja. Verraten muihin tuotteisiin kategoriassa Kannettavat, Apple MacBook Retina 12-inch, Early 2016 (MLHA2, MLHC2, MMGM2, MMGL2, MLHE2, MLHF2, MLH82, MLH72) on saanut alaScore™-arvosanan 96/100 = Paras.

Katso kaikki Apple Kannettavat tuotteet

Arvostelun analyysi

(Perustuen 153:n arvosteluun)

Ammattilaisten arvostelut  

Käyttäjäarvostelut  

Näytetään 153 arvostelu(a)

Ammattilaisten arvostelut Käyttäjäarvostelut

Vastuuvapauslauseke:

Alla on lista arviota tästä tai vastaavia tuotteita. Jos luulet tämä ryhmittymä on väärä klikkaa tästä lippua.
Lue lisää meidän FAQ sivu.
Näyttää 1 - 81, 153:sta Näytä arvostelut: Suomi:ksi | muissa kielissä

Käyttäjän arvostelun tuottaa: (amazon.co.uk)

Amazon.co.uk review summary for Apple MacBook Retina 12-inch, Early 2016 (MLHA2, MLHC2, MMGM2, MMGL2, MLHE2, MLHF2, MLH82, MLH72)

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 4 user reviews of Apple MacBook Retina 12-inch, Early 2016 (MLHA2, MLHC2, MMGM2, MMGL2, MLHE2, MLHF2, MLH82, MLH72) from Amazon.co.uk. The average user rating for this product is 4.8/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.0/5 for other Laptops on Amazon.co.uk. Reviewers are impressed by the size and portability. The screen and performance are also mentioned favorably.

keyboard, performance, screen, portability, size

100% of the reviews on Amazon.co.uk give this product a positive rating.

Tämä yhteenveto perustuu tuotteisiin: Apple MLHE2B/A MacBook 12-Inch Laptop (Intel Core m3 1.1 GHz, 8 GB RAM, 256 GB Storage, Intel HD Graphics 515, OS X El Capitan)Apple MLHE2B/A MacBook 12-Inch Laptop (Intel Core m3 1.1 GHz, 8 GB RAM, 256 GB Storage, Intel HD Graphics 515, OS X El Capitan)

03-2017

Käyttäjän arvostelun tuottaa: (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for Apple MacBook Retina 12-inch, Early 2016 (MLHA2, MLHC2, MMGM2, MMGL2, MLHE2, MLHF2, MLH82, MLH72)

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 66 user reviews of Apple MacBook Retina 12-inch, Early 2016 (MLHA2, MLHC2, MMGM2, MMGL2, MLHE2, MLHF2, MLH82, MLH72) from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 3.8/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other Laptops on Amazon.com. Reviewers are impressed by the usability and screen. The design and portability also get good feedback. There are some less positive comments about the connectivity and image quality, and there are some mixed opinions about the reliability.

performance, portability, design, screen, usability

image quality, connectivity

77% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

Tämä yhteenveto perustuu tuotteisiin: Apple MacBook MLHA2LL/A 12-Inch Laptop with Retina Display (Silver, 256 GB) NEWEST VERSIONApple MacBook MLHA2LL/A 12-Inch Laptop with Retina Display (Silver, 256 GB) NEWEST VERSION

03-2017

Käyttäjän arvostelun tuottaa: (amazon.fr)

Résumé des avis d’ Amazon.fr sur Apple MacBook Retina 12-inch, Early 2016 (MLHA2, MLHC2, MMGM2, MMGL2, MLHE2, MLHF2, MLH82, MLH72)

 

alaTest a collecté et analysé 1 avis de consommateurs sur Amazon.fr pour le produit Apple MacBook Retina 12-inch, Early 2016 (MLHA2, MLHC2, MMGM2, MMGL2, MLHE2, MLHF2, MLH82, MLH72). La note moyenne du produit est 1.0 sur 5, tandis que les autres Ordinateurs Portables ont une note moyenne de 3.8 sur 5 sur Amazon.fr.

0% des avis sur Amazon.fr donnent une note favorable à ce produit.

Tämä yhteenveto perustuu tuotteisiin: Macbook 12in 1.1ghz Dc Core M3Macbook 12in 1.1ghz Dc Core M3

03-2017

Ammattilaisten arvostelun tuottaa: Rhiannon Williams (pocket-lint.com)

Apple MacBook (2016) review: Is port-free still the future?

 

The revival of the MacBook range in spring 2015 resulted in one of the most beautiful and portable Apple laptops: the 12-inch MacBook. It was also one of the most controversial, with just a single USB Type-C port handling all the connectivity and...

Small size and lightweight design, quality screen, Force Touch trackpad, day's battery life

Still only one USB Type-C (two would be better), no touchscreen, no Touch ID, expensive

The 12-inch MacBook has divided opinion since day one, having done-away with a full-size USB port for the smaller USB Type-C. A couple of years down the line and this will be a more standard format, but the bigger issue is the MacBook's persistence to...

09-2016

Ammattilaisten arvostelun tuottaa: Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner (notebookcheck.net)

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Review

 

Apple has relatively quietly refreshed its MacBook 12 series. While the basic principles remained unchanged compared to the predecessor from 2015 (see review), the notebook hardware was brought up-to-date with an Intel Skylake processor and fast NVMe...

outstanding Retina screen, precise Force-Touch trackpad, notable speaker quality, high-end aluminum chassis, silent as passively cooled, yet still not very hot

a single combo port is a serious restriction, the short key travel causes typing errors again and again, no charge indicator via LED, poor maintainability and upgradeability (iFixit 1/10 points), single core performance is slightly lower than the...

The 12-inch MacBook is and remains an impressive device. Low weight, an excellent display, and its build quality are outstanding properties. However, not much has changed compared to the model from 2015. Slightly improved graphics performance and...

Ammattilaisten arvostelun tuottaa: (laptopmag.com)

Apple MacBook 2016 Review

 

It's best to think of the 2016 MacBook as a MacBook S. Similar to the evolution from the iPhone 6 to the iPhone 6s, Apple didn't revamp the design for its ultraslim 2-pound laptop. Instead, the company focused mostly on internal upgrades for the...

11-2016

Ammattilaisten arvostelun tuottaa: Jamison Cush (NotebookReview.com)

Apple MacBook 2016 Review: The Good, The Bad, The Expensive

 

The new Apple MacBook is expensive considering its specs. But it also arguably has the best hardware on the market. Does that make it a compelling product? Read on to find out.

Great hardware ; Excellent display ; Best touchpad on the market

Overpriced for its performance ; Single USB Type-C port frustrating, accessories expensive ; Display not a touchscreen ; Shallow key travel makes for uncomfortable typing

05-2016

Ammattilaisten arvostelun tuottaa: Lauren Goode (theverge.com)

MacBook 2016 review: all of the possibilities, all of the realities

 

Last year's introduction of the 12-inch MacBook — that's just MacBook, not MacBook Air or MacBook Pro — highlighted some of the best elements of Apple design. The laptop is beautiful, super thin,...

Incredibly thin/light ; Beautiful Retina display ; Improved performance

Still not as powerful as other MacBooks ; Shallow, edge-to-edge keyboard ; Single USB Type-C port

05-2016

Ammattilaisten arvostelun tuottaa: Michael Passingham (trustedreviews.com)

MacBook (12-inch, 2016)

 

Apple's flagship laptop has had a refresh, and while not huge amount has changed over last year's model, it's the same price for an improved specification. Win-win, right?

05-2016

Ammattilaisten arvostelun tuottaa: Cliff Joseph (zdnet.com)

Apple MacBook (2016) review: Skylake update improves performance and battery life

 

The MacBook's lightweight design is hard to beat for portability, but there are alternatives that offer better battery life and more connectivity for office use.

Sleek ultraportable 12-inch laptop weighing just 920g ; Impressive Retina Display ; Improved battery life and GPU performance

Expensive ; Few upgrade or repair options ; Limited connectivity

04-2016

Ammattilaisten arvostelun tuottaa: (stuff.tv)

Apple MacBook (2016) review

 

More power, more pink, but what else?

Good battery life ; Great screen ; Lovely trackpad, good keyboard layout ; Class-leading speakers

Rubbish connectivity is still annoying ; No memory card slot ; Mixed feelings about the slim keyboard

Two pounds of pink aside it’s much like last year’s 12in MacBook. But that’s no bad thing.

04-2016

Ammattilaisten arvostelun tuottaa: Roman Loyola (pcworld.com)

Cyberlink PowerDVD 16 review: Enough new features to justify upgrading (from PowerDVD 14, at least)

 

When it comes to hardware, Apple isn't afraid to force its users to adapt, to change habits. Longtime Mac users remember when Apple stopped including floppy and optical drives, or when FireWire was discontinued. More recently, Mac users have had to...

Small size and light weight make it ideal for travel ; Increased performance ; Improved battery life

Only one USB-C port for charging and peripherals ; Reduced key travel on keyboard makes the keys uncomfortable to press ; 480p FaceTime camera ; No flash storage customization options available

The MacBook is for the user who values portability over anything else. The 2016 edition comes with a welcomed speed boost and a Rose Gold option.

04-2016

Ammattilaisten arvostelun tuottaa: (engadget.com)

Apple's updated MacBook is indeed faster with longer battery life

 

Apple deserves credit for improving the MacBook's battery life and disk speeds, but other than that, this is, for better and worse, the same machine as last year's model. If you previously shied away from the 12-inch MacBook because of the "one port"...

Lightweight, attractive design ; Comfortable keyboard ; Gorgeous display ; Improved SSD speeds ; New model does indeed get an extra hour of battery life ; Now available in pink, if that's your thing

Still just one port; adapters sold separately ; Battery life still trails other ultraportables, including Apple's own MacBook Air

How similar is the updated MacBook to last year's model? Put it this way: I was strongly tempted to assign it the exact same score. In the end, I decided it deserved a slightly higher number as a way of acknowledging the extra hour of battery life and...

04-2016